December 1, 2009
Article by J. Hapiak (Opinion)       

Can America Stop The Coming Oppression?

Could Climategate Unravel the UN’s Plan to Rule the World?
In a matter of days, President Obama will write a brand new chapter in American history, one that fulfils the promise of change that the Americans asked for, but not necessarily the change that they hoped for.  What I am speaking about is the Copenhagen Climate Treaty that President Obama had promised to sign around December 9, 2009, that could forever surrender American sovereignty.

Now with the emergence of Climategate as reported all over the internet, and Senator Inhofe’s calling for an investigation into that matter which implies that the top UN climate scientists had cooked the science of climate change for profit . . . the signing of this document has been supposedly postponed, but the President still has plans to make the trip to Copenhagen anyhow.

Since the advent of the internet’s invention, high schools, colleges and universities the world over have looked to tailor their courses to high levels of web-based internet investigation in view of its rapid ongoing development that has served to make the web an invaluable study tool due to the vast array of resources it has served to make availabe to even the most ordinary and average of users.

Even so, despite its widespread use and availability to customers the world over, far too a lot of students still do not know how to use the internet’s full potential as a study tool to support the work that they are undertaking as part of their studies in almost every subject known to man in schools, colleges and universities for internet research. Too many students still do not know how to make even the most fundamental of search engines work to their advantage for their net investigation to create viable material at a touch of a button rather than having to invest hourse refining their search terms and going by means of page following page of search results from their internet research. They fail to appreciate the value of one simple tool for getting the specific results that they want from their web investigation that is appropriate at your fingertips at this extremely moment as each and every and each one of you sit reading this really article on your personal computer screen correct now – the speech marks button (“”).

I am all too usually amazed at how many students come to me each and every and each and every week saying that they have had trouble carrying out their internet research in all manner of subjects and in a selection of subject areas simply because they are finding far too a lot of outcomes to go by means of to decide regardless of whether their internt research is producing any material of academic value for them. Of course there are frequently occassions where there are real difficulties that will need to be dealt with where a student has trouble determining what is of academic value (no Wikipedia please!!), but far more often than not the problem is merely a case of the student failing to use the speech marks button on the search engine they have chosen and/or even the specific subject database like Westlaw or Lexis Nexis to effectively narrow their investigation results and get the finest materials.

Recently the United States government has passed a law creating it illegal for credit card organizations or other such institutions in the United States to make payments over the web to companies that are involved in on the web gambling. I for my component would like to say that I am not a gambler of any kind as the times that I have been to a casino or gambled at 1 are so couple of as to be counted on one hand so it is not with a personal interest that I am against such a law nor is it that I profit in any way, shape or form from on the internet gambling or any other kind. I merely speak out against a law that I think about to be unfair, illogical and hypocritical as it permits the identical activity when practiced in Casinos in cities like Las Vegas or Atlantic City but not on the internet. To my way of thinking this is the equivalent of passing a law that makes it illegal to consume liquor in bars but not in restaurants where the activity is left unaltered but for some reason the law strikes out against.