Web posted Jan. 16, 2002

Main Page
News Reports
Center Commentary
From the Editor
Join the Center

Enter your e-mail address and click 'Go' to subscribe to The Public i and receive brief overview of each issue. It's FREE!
Advanced Search

Special Report
Administration Ties to Arthur Andersen
Nearly as Tight as Those to Enron

By John Dunbar and Nathaniel Heller

(WASHINGTON, Jan. 16) -- Arthur Andersen LLP, the accounting firm that has been implicated in the collapse of Enron Corp., was a top contributor to President George W. Bush's political campaigns. (See the tables below)

Since 1998, Andersen and its employees have contributed $212,825 to Bush, including $25,000 in donations to Bush's inaugural celebration when he was governor of the state of Texas. The total makes Andersen one of Bush's biggest financial backers.


Fourteen Top Bush Officials Invested in Enron Stock (Jan.11, 2012)

Enron Top Brass Accused of Dumping Stock Were Big Political Donors (Jan. 9, 2002)

Overall, since 1998, Andersen has spent $8.1 million to influence the federal government, including $6 million on lobbying expenditures.

Like its client Enron, Andersen had strong ties to the Bush campaign and administration. Two former lobbyists for the firm now occupy high-level positions in the administration.

Stephen Goddard Jr., a managing partner in charge of Andersen's Houston office who was relieved of management responsibilities on January 15, 2001, was a Bush "pioneer," meaning he raised at least $100,000 for Bush's presidential campaign.

Andersen's political action committees also gave generously to members of Congress. They contributed $27,000 to Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-La.) over the last three years. Tauzin, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, is currently leading one of the congressional investigations of Enron and Andersen. Over the last three years, he's been the top congressional recipient of Andersen political action committee contributions, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Andersen is in the midst of growing investigations into the collapse of energy giant Enron Corp., which filed for bankruptcy in December following a company disclosure that it had hidden massive amounts of debt off its balance sheet. Andersen was the company's independent auditor, and assured investors that, in their opinion, the company's financial statements presented "fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Enron Corp."

Andersen has admitted to destroying a "significant but undetermined number" of documents relating to the Enron audit. The firm announced it fired the partner in charge of Enron's audits, David B. Duncan, who rushed subordinates to shred records of Enron's audits that had been requested, but not yet subpoenaed, by government investigators.

Like Enron, Andersen is a defendant in shareholder lawsuits that allege the firm did not properly disclose Enron's financial position to investors.

Andersen, a huge accounting and consulting business with 85,000 employees in 84 countries, has been a prodigious spender on other political activities.

In researching "The Buying of the President 2010," the Center determined Andersen was Bush's 13th largest career patron through June 30, 1999. By comparison, former Vice President Al Gore received $8,200 from Andersen employees when he ran for president, according to documents from the Federal Election Commission.

Capitol Hill connections

The company's political action committee has spent $1.3 million on House and Senate members since 1998, with Democrats receiving slightly less than half as much as Republicans. Among the recipients was current Attorney General John Ashcroft, who accepted $10,000 for his unsuccessful Senate reelection campaign, according to CRP.

Ashcroft recused himself from the criminal investigation of Enron after the Center reported one of his campaign committees received a $25,000 contribution from the company.

Tauzin has been critical of Andersen. "Anyone who destroyed records simply out of stupidity should be fired; anyone who destroyed records intentionally to subvert our investigation should be prosecuted," he is quoted in a committee press statement. "One way or another, our committee will get to the bottom of this debacle."

Andersen also spent a little over $500,000 in unregulated, soft money contributions to political parties, the vast majority going to the GOP.

Outstripping those numbers by far, however, is the amount Andersen spends on lobbying. Since 1998, the company has spent $6 million in-house on lobbying Congress, according to lobby disclosure records. They also retained outside firms to lobby for them.

Among the issues the company pushed was legislation to consider the retail deregulation of the electric utility industry, a key issue for Enron and its chairman, Kenneth Lay.

Andersen's stable of lobbyists includes names from Washington's power elite.

Former Andersen lobbyists Nicholas Calio and Kirsten Ardleigh Chadwick, who worked for the firm O'Brien Calio, now head up President Bush's legislative affairs office at the White House. The two are the White House's top lobbyists to Congress and are charged with pushing the administration's legislative agenda on Capitol Hill.

According to federal lobbying records, Andersen paid O'Brien Calio $60,000 to lobby on Internal Revenue Service reform legislation in the first half of 1998. Calio and Arleigh Chadwick worked on that effort, according to the lobbying disclosure form. They moved to the White House shortly after President Bush's inauguration.

Interests beyond accounting

Andersen began lobbying on the issue of electricity deregulation as early as 1996, and continued into 1998. Enron had been trying to get Congress to create a wholly competitive environment in the electric utility industry for years. One state that deregulated, California, still has utilities that owe millions of dollars to Enron. Similar efforts to pass legislation to deregulate electric utilities at the federal level have failed.

Andersen has also spent large amounts of money to influence the Securities and Exchange Commission to allow large accounting and consulting firms to perform both services for their corporate clients.

Among the sharpest criticisms of Andersen's role in Enron's collapse is the fact that Andersen provides both auditing and consulting services, considered by many experts to be a conflict of interest.

Last year, SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, Jr. proposed a rule that would have restricted the amount of non-audit-related consulting work that companies like Arthur Andersen and other Big Five accounting firms could do for their audit clients. Andersen opposed the rule, and hired the powerful lobby shop of Clark & Weinstock to argue its case.

Among the Clark & Weinstock lobbyists working Capitol Hill on behalf of Andersen were former congressman Vic Fazio (D-Calif.); Jim Matthews, former chief of staff to Rep. Thomas Manton (D-N.Y.); and Anne Urban, formerly Sen. Robert Kerrey's (D-Neb.) legislative director.

Under pressure from the Big Five, the Commission ultimately adopted a weak version of the rule that favored the accounting industry and left their consulting services virtually untouched. The rule required only the disclosure of how much money the accounting firm earned for consulting services from each company it audited. No limits were placed on the amount of money an audit firm could earn.

'The most incredible fight'

Levitt called the brawl with the accounting industry "the most incredible fight I have ever been involved in." At the time, Jeffrey Peck, a managing director for Andersen, said the rule would cut his firm's market potential by 40 percent.

Given the stakes, allies of the accounting firms mounted a vigorous campaign against any limitation on their market potential. Among those arguing against the proposed rule was Harvey L. Pitt, then an attorney with the firm of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson. Bush appointed Pitt chairman of the SEC; the Senate confirmed him in August 2001.

Pitt represented Andersen, as well as the four other Big Five firms, as a private lawyer before returning to government service in 2001. As chairman of Fried, Frank's Washington, D.C., office, Pitt worked on behalf of the Big Five "on a wide range of regulatory issues relating to their scope of services and firm structures," according to a company biography.

Despite his ties to Andersen, Pitt has said he will not recuse himself from the SEC's Enron investigation. "It is not the function of the chairman of the SEC, or any commissioner, to manage an investigation," Pitt explained in a written statement.

Pitt opposed limits on the amount of consulting work the Big Five could do for their audit clients before Levitt proposed the SEC rule. In a 1998 article, Pitt and colleague David Birenbaum wrote that "there is no empirical basis for the proposition that the provision of non-audit services for audit clients leads to audit failure," according to a Washington Post story published last summer.

According to reports, Enron paid Arthur Andersen $52 million in 2000. Twenty-seven million came from consulting services, $25 million from auditing services. In a congressional hearing in December, Bernardino said the consulting fees not related to audit functions were only $13 million of the $52 million total.

Andersen's audits have been questioned before. The firm was the accountant for Sunbeam, which grossly overstated its profits, and Andersen agreed to pay $110 million to settle shareholder suits without admitting or denying blame. Waste Management, another client of Andersen, overstated income by $1 billion. Andersen agreed to pay part of a $220 million class-action settlement and a $7 million civil penalty, without admitting liability, according to a New York Times story.

Contributions made by Andersen to George W. Bush*

Employees Inaugural Total




* Includes $25,000 to Bush's inaugural celebration in 1998
Source: Center for Public Integrity

Andersen in-house lobbying expenses
1998 1999 2000 2001* Total
$1,600,000 $1,040,000 $2,480,000 $920,000 $6,040,000

*First 6 months
Source: Legislative Resource Center

Andersen PAC money

Election Cycle House Democrats House GOP Senate Democrats Senate GOP Total
1998 $109,619 $192,877 $48,000 $77,090 $427,586
2000 $168,675 $315,451 $42,584 $113,789 $640,499
2002 $78,855 $130,032 $39,000 $31,793 $279,680
Total $357,149 $638,360 $129,584 $222,672 $1,347,765

Source: Center for Responsive Politics

Andersen soft money

Party 1998 2000 2002 Total
Democrats $1,250 $25,750 $0 $27,000
GOP $105,000 $236,500 $132,262 $473,762
Total $106,250 $262,250 $132,262 $500,762

Source: Center for Responsive Politics

All spending

Type Amount
Contributions $212,825 
Lobbying $6,040,000
PAC Money $1,347,765
Soft Money $500,762
Total $8,101,352

In August 2010, Andersen Consulting, a division of Andersen Worldwide, formally split from Arthur Andersen, the more traditional auditing and accounting component of the firm. After arbitration, Andersen Consulting changed its name to Accenture, a change it made in January 2001. Accenture became a publicly traded company four months later.

For this story, contributions made by Andersen Consulting or its employees or PAC before August 2000 were counted toward the totals above.

*  *  *

Center for Public Integrity Database Editor MaryJo Sylwester contributed to this report. To write a letter to the editor for publication, send to letters@publicintegrity.org. Please include a daytime telephone number.

� Copyright 2012, The Center for Public Integrity. All rights reserved.

Main Page News Reports  Center Commentary  Subscribe  From the Editor  Feedback  Join the Center for Public Integrity

� Copyright 2012, The Center for Public Integrity. All rights reserved
IMPORTANT: Read the Copyright & Disclaimer statement for more information.